Reviewny.com
December 1, 2000
Susan Bee
New Paintings, Artists' Books
Columbia University
Through December 15, 2000
by Eileen Tabios
"you can't leave the theater humming the critique"
--Charles
Bernstein, Log Rhythms
One reads as much as
views Susan Bee's paintings. This means
one can approach her work by considering words in general as well as the paint
and found objects through which she creates her works. One can consider, for example, poetry –
specifically, how contemporary poetry is marked by the varied ways through
which poets fragment text and/or disrupt narrative to reflect cultural, social
and political concerns. Some poets may
shy away from lyricism and traditional forms of poetry as part of their
questioning of the role of language in promoting inequities. Others may collage into poems the words of
other authors to reflect the difficulty of answering the question "Who am
I?" As they explore these
questions, some of these poets also come to be concerned with how their poems
may offer some relevance – some meaning – to readers who are unaware of or
indifferent to the particular issues underlying how they write their
poems. Perhaps a different way of
considering this question is to ask: if art is to avoid solipsism, how does one
create art fully reflective of one's environment and history without being
dragged into nihilism from the awareness that oppression will last as long as
human history – that to live is to engage, whether knowingly or not, with power
struggles?
Bee's recent
paintings affirm an impression I received from her prior one-person show
earlier this year at A.I.R. Gallery that she is directly addressing this
question. Equally important, she
explores this issue in a manner that enhances the visual effectiveness of her
paintings.
As shown in the
exhibit's paintings which were painted from 1995-2000, Bee's works long have
used a variety of materials and methods to reflect her wide-ranging
considerations that include patriarchy, cultural norms or standards based on
illusion, and power. Consequently, one
can ascribe (and critics in the past have used) such words as "political,"
"feminist," "historically conscious," "cerebral"
and "cultural commentary" to describe Bee's works. While appropriate, these terms cannot
capture what Bee creates in her paintings.
Her work, too, reveals that art cannot be separated from, but
nonetheless is not only, intention.
To discuss her work
is also to surface words like "colorist," gestural," "painterly"
– in other words, one should revert to aesthetic as much as philosophical terms
because Bee never sacrifices her focus on the physical properties of her
material to the altar of concept. Bee
remains a painter; and as a painter, she is an astute colorist.
Red Dot, 1998,
for example, is a relatively small painting (18 X 38 inches) that juxtaposes
through paint and collage at least ten different colors, three playing cards
whose images include cherubs flying through air and sitting on an anchor,
metallic gold glitter, red dots (of course), as well as paper cut-outs of a
blindfolded Valkyrie, a couple linked in an embrace with the man's face buried
in her hair, and a woman in a low-cut dress whose skirt is lifted to reveal
high-heeled legs. Also glued on the
painting are children's toys – two purple snakes and one silver spider. In addition, the painting contains fractured
grids and color fields, as well as a gray section on the forefront ("forefront"
because the varied elements create a multi-layered space) that is overlayed
with delicate black lines evoking the ink drawings of Henri Michaux. One can "read" how the painting
pokes fun at so-called "fine art" by incorporating kitschy elements
and images from film noir, or how the painting transcends (and thus subverts)
art historical categories by combining abstract gesturalism with found
objects. Ultimately, however, this
assemblage works because of the overall harmony effected visually through the
painterly devices of surface and color.
Bee's use of paint
and compatible (and pleasurably-unexpected) color combinations in order to
unify her material evokes an excerpt from the poem "Log Rhythms" by
Charles Bernstein, with whom she collaborated to create an artist book (one of
four books featured in the exhibit):
"…Do I make myself insulate,
endometrial, inchoate, irradiant, bossa
nova, lindy hop, cha cha cha? I've got
a word right here and it has your name
written all over it.
Hoops or hoopla?
Or whooping cough?
Whiplash? Survival
without dignity that's one thing; but survival
without property?"
Property – the physical
attributes of her material – is exactly what Bee does not surrender even as she
explores her feminist and political concerns.
But she also uses her intellectual interests to uplift her raw material. In Soujourner's
Truth, 2000, a cut-out image features the anti-slavery and women's rights
activist in a gray dress holding a pouch emblazoned with the image of a
policeman with a truncheon pushing forward a handcuffed prisoner. Sojourner's figure on the left side of the
painting acts like a tree trunk to become the base of green limbs flowing out
from her head to depict two gray flowers as well as images including a brown
monkey raising a gun. From the gun's
barrel emanates an orange and white bloom that can either be fire or a flower.
On the painting's right side, another tree-like extension offers more images at
its appendages, including a man in a cell.
The second structure of green limbs allows a balanced composition
against the Sojourner tree. Sojourner
also seems replicated in miniature at the left edge of the painting, but
through a gray cutout of the Statue of Liberty whose torch emanates another
orange-ish bloom of flames similar to what came out of the monkey's gun as well
as the form blooming out from Sojourner's head. Bee also painted blood-like stains on Sojourner's dress, from
which she drew arrows pointing to other parts of the painting that might relate
to the blood stains; some arrows point to humans like a man wielding an ax
while other arrows point simply to some of the colored dots and rectangular
brushstrokes strewn throughout the paining.
It's as if Bee is positing that a charged figurative image (like a cop
arresting a man) is also a set of colors she can rework into a painting – which
is to say, art can be political but politics alone is not necessarily art.
Thus, Sojourner's Truth honors the life of the
activist who lived from 1797 to 1883.
When juxtaposing images from her life with seemingly non sequitur
visuals from collaged cut-outs of a clown holding up an umbrella, a doll and
two kids playing in front of a grinning pumpkin, Bee reminds us of the price
paid throughout history so that some of us can afford to live aspects of our
life with innocence. But the painting
is also a skillful abstraction of primarily orange, brown, green and gray – a
color field one might associate with certain African textiles. This means that until one might realize the
reference to Sojourner Truth through the painting's title, one already can
appreciate the painting based on the balanced, colorful imagery.
Indeed, two of Bee's
four 2000 paintings in the show – Sojourner's
Truth and Clouds of Joy –
incorporate a layering of small round or rectangular brush strokes in a loose
pointillist manner. When compared with
the use of grids or color fields to link together disparate images in older
paintings such as Beware the Lady, 1999,
Love Is A Gentle Whip, 1999 and Red Dot, one can see Bee continuing to
extend her consistent investigation of, and loyalty to, painting even as she
lived through the period that prematurely blared the death of her medium.
Bee has turned her
eye onto a troubled world and brought its sometimes dysfunctional fragments
into her paintings. Unlike poets who
lay textual fragments on the page to highlight rupture through caesuras and
juxtaposed meanings, Bee is interested in unifying the fragments. This, she accomplishes through color as well
as the surface and gesture of her brushstrokes. She is a political artist making paintings, not politics. (In the interest of full disclosure, I wish
to reveal that I own a painting by Bee which initially intrigued me for how she
collaged in cut-out images of women in various film noir type of poses as she
questioned the cultural judgment of what makes a woman "warped." Having lived with the painting for several
months, I am now struck most by the eloquence of her painted lines and the
vividness with which she portrays the color blue.) Bee is a cultural activist, too, by being as strong as possible
in her medium of painting – her wisdom evokes another excerpt from "Log
Rhythms" for she knows that painting is like poetry more than it is like
politics. That is, politics (in whose
engagement must lie communication, including miscommunication) can be
articulated but painting cannot –
I know that the radiance before me has no name and that it
comes not from my imagination nor some place beyond. That each night and in the day you are suffused with a glow that
is solid, sturdy, contained or then again like the shine of the sun at play in
the rippling water. It's something so
utterly ordinary, unburdened by mystique or the romance of intoxication,
riveting without rivets, flush with the flesh of years. As one sobered into exultation or grounded
to a circuit, or like the stew that simmers but does not boil, suffused passion
eclipses its infatuated cousin, whose spiked intensities are consolation for,
or premonitions of, that fire that burns but will not expire.
Lehman Suites and
Papers Gallery
406 School of
International Affairs
Columbia University
New York, N.Y. 10027
212-854-3060