Born with the legacy
of incomprehensibility,
I am aware that I can never forget, but also that I will never understand. And so I am opposed, I think, to transparent language because language is always in process and in trial. I am, of course, anti-closure, anti-completion. And don't talk to me about the fixed past. I do not privilege the essential and invariant to escape the perils of uncertainty. Certainly not. Personally, I prefer chaos, digression, non-directionality. Those who claim that the office of knowledge is to uncover antecedental reality in order to distance the real itself are full of shit. They are mere spectators of reality. If you like the game, play.

---

back | next
titles