Subject: modernists were (like) communists To: 88v@dept.english.upenn.edu Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 07:41:45 -0500 (EST) Sender: owner-88v@dept.english.upenn.edu Precedence: bulk 88ers: This contribution to the already good discussion of "Cottage Street, 1953" has a title: "MODERNISTS WERE COMMUNISTS?" Alexandra wrote: Being "different" was much worse in the 1950''s than it is today. Not only were those who weren't "mainstream" ostracized and shunned, many were labeled "communists." I have a feeling McCarthy and the Red Scare is applicable background information for Wilbur and his portrayal of Sylvia Plath in such a way. Although Wilbur's poem is not at all about communism, it is, as Alexandra notes, about conformity. Wilbur, I think, knowingly, somewhat reluctantly, but for the most part confidently, accepts limitation tradition conformist social values along with a "return to traditional poetic forms" (the so-called "new formalism" of the 50s) all in an atmosphere that precisely animated the "red scare." In a sense the "free" craziness of poets who don't do well socially at Edna Ward's tea afternoons in staid New England are in need of saving by those of us who, like--Wilbur, ahhhhh, sadly but confidently--are comfortable enough with tradition to be the ones doing the saving. In this climate, modernists are "out there" in a way not so unlike the way communists are "out there." This was all a matter of poetic form. Note how carefully and deliberately the form of this poem implies an endorsement of Mrs. Ward's system of social ethics and condemns the version of "free" embodied in the doomed, burning-candle-at-both-ends freakishly free Sylvia. Someone -- not I? it's your job! -- should comment more specifically on the way Wilbur's poetic form comments further on the Edna Ward/Sylvia Plath alternative. --Al