To: 88v@dept.english.upenn.edu Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:10:39 -0500 (EST) Sender: owner-88v@dept.english.upenn.edu Precedence: bulk A&B ----------- Ali the poem is designed to offer us the choice of having a wall to distinguish us from others; or not having any boundaries, an idea he plays with B --------------- Chris P. the wall-supporting act is a barbaric practice Kirsten the speaker clearly questions the need for the wall Jennifer B. walls are sometimes bad but what's really bad is that the neighbor won't examine his language Justin people love the wall to escape nature Dan he frowns on the annual ritual Anthony he is quite critical of the rural tradition Bryan the neighbor is a droning worker, disliked by F Robert sometimes one needs a wall, but that's the exception P.T. the communication between the neighbors is bad, flawed; the wall is not particularly helpful in convening them Sean the writing is free and without walls--thus helping prove F's undermining the wall A -------------- Dan R. it's not a modernist poem & we would be mistaken to think Frost wants the wall down; take the wall away & the relationship will be changed Sara R. why does Frost go back again and again if he hates it? Al he goes back because it's an aesthetic ritual for him; without the wall we would lose the traditional aesthetic, the well-marked-off; he hates modernism, preferring tennis w/ a net Joan B is too strongly against the wall; A leaves room for ambiguity (Frost doesn't just dislike the wall; it has possibilities) Lauryl Speaker knows wall doesn't naturally want to stay in place--but for all its artifice it does bring me closer together. Scott Ideally the wall should go; but it's not an ideal world Natalie we need our space & individuality Ben he knows what he's walling out--the neighbor! Melissa the barrier is a form of stabililty Julie (reluctantly) Francesca we may not actually need to be separated, but we need to be aware they're there Alexandra it's part of the cycle of ritual purification