Robert Kelly self-published Axon Dendron Tree in 1967 as Salitter
/ 2, distributed variously through his other small press journal, Matter, as well as the legendary
Asphodel Bookshop of Cleveland, Ohio. The stapled 8½ by 14 publication appears
to have been mimeographed, a process that would have
limited distribution to the approximately 150 copies that could reliably be run
off each paper master. The process also partly explains why the 80 page
publication was printed only on one side of each page, rendering the volume as
thick as a typical 160-page book. The other part of that explanation lies in
the stapling – the book is so thick that extra-length staples have been driven
in both front & back, but in no instance make it through the entire volume
– I have to squeeze them by hand back into place whenever I read from this
volume. This is one fragile book. The title – centered on a strip of white
paper, 11 inches high but only 2 inches wide – is glued along the left side of
the cover’s brown construction paper. The brush strokes of the glue have long
since stained through on my copy.* Because of its size, this volume has spent
35 years sitting atop my book cases, nev er filed within one.
This is an awfully fragile,
fugitive publication to argue as one of the defining poetic tex ts of the 1960s, but it certainly is/was such an
event for my 1960s. In fact, it may
have proven more so for me than for Kelly, who accords Tree just one six-page excerpt in his selected poems, Red Actions (Black Sparrow, 1995). The
differences between the 1967 edition and his 1995 description of it are worth
considering.
A note to the reader at the
top of the dedication page reads as follows:
Axon Dendron Tree grew out of my reading of that issue of Poetry [October,
1965] wholly & with immense rightness given over to one section of
Louis Zukofsky’s A (sic). This poem began swiftly in
response & dictated in the first few dozen lines its own formal procedure.
To the extent that I had any intention, it was to honor Zukofsky by letting his
measure foster a like but different measure in my utterance. The concerns of
this poem are its own, and have no bearing on Zukofsky’s there or elsewhere,
apart from a few teasing relations.
Kelly discusses Axon Dendron Tree’s formal procedures in
the notes at the back of Red Actions:
Axon Dendron Tree. A long poem organized on a numeric
structure. Each section consists of 111 unnumbered stanzas; the first section’s
stanzas are nine lines each, the second section’s of eight, and so on,
diminishing to the last section, 111 one-line stanzas. In my own sense of my
work, this is my first real achievement using any sort of compositional grid or
organizational principal other than the Local Music, which has always been the
self-arising guide of the poem.
The 999 line structure
described here is certainly elegant. However, the opening section of Axon Dendron Tree is composed of stanzas
of eight lines each, not nine. At least as published in 1967, the poem has 888
lines. Tree begins with, of all
things, an image of golf:
Tee
off
&
be
on
grass
this is
start
of
eighty
leven
pages
in the
book
each
makes
a form
I
counted
7
then
8
came
or hard
to
render
stanzas
like
boxes
each
one
a line
of Wace
his Engels
while LaŠ·amon
his
Brut
took
the
augury
of
heard
—sruti—
beginnings
frutti
Lazamon – there are multiple ways to spell that name & Kelly
picks one of the more difficult to cast into HTML – translated Wace’s own French translation of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s
Latin history of Britain , Brut, into alliterative
verse around 1190. Henry Wace, however, was a mostly
19th century religious scholar who focused on early Christianity, a
topic that also concerned Karl Marx’s collaborator. So Kelly is almost
instantly playing with several layers of connotation at once, the discussion of
form cast into many directions from which the poet might then proceed. & does.
It’s interesting to contrast
Kelly’s programmatic conception of form with that of his model. Zukofsky’s “A” – 14, Beginning An, starts with four
stanzas, even more extreme in their verticalism than
Kelly’s:
An
our
sun
fire
pulp
whets
us
(everyday)
for
us
eat
it
its
fire’s
unconsumed
we’ll
not
fire
there
rocketed
that
poor
fools
be
sure
moon
loon
bless
light
he
pees
pea
blossom
sun’s
peer.
First of
eleven songs
beginning An
in the
middle
of
solar
winds
Beginning with the above
italics, Zukofsky proceeds with 169 tercets, all but one line containing two
words, then with 247 tercets with three words – save for two “ringers,” one a
four-line stanza with one word per line, the other just two stanzas further on,
a couplet, one of whose lines has just two words – before dropping back first
to a tercet of two-word lines, and then two
concluding stanzas of one-word lines.
Zukofsky’s formal focus is
very much on the line, Kelly’s on the stanza – it’s almost as if two men looked
at one phenomenon with just slightly different lenses. Zukofsky’s conception of
form generates the line, perhaps, but Kelly’s sense generates the poem. It’s a
critical, even decisive, difference. In Red
Actions, Kelly again acknowledges Zukofsky’s relation to the Axon Dendron Tree:
The whole poem is
dedicated to Louis Zukofsky, in thanks for his creative kindness, as a poet to
us all, and as a man to me when I was beginning. He is one of the Four Masters
(with Olson, Duncan , Blackburn ) who boxed my ears.
One name Kelly doesn’t
mention here is that of Jackson Mac Low, whose work he certainly knew, having
published several pieces in A Controversy
of Poets, but whom I suspect Kelly must have seen more as a peer, given how
late Mac Low got started publishing.** Mac Low’s sense
of program as the motive principle behind a tex t was already quite developed by the mid-1960s. Axon Dendron Tree, however, may be the
first such attempt to “just write poetry” by such method without constraint as
to how the vocabulary might look or sound. Where Mac Low was consciously
striking the ego’s presence in his work, Kelly gives it pretty much free rein.
In this sense, Axon Dendron Tree is
closer to two other programmatic texts that were composed in the late 1960s,
Ted Berrigan’s Sonnets and Kenneth
Koch’s When the Sun Tries to Go On.
Axon Dendron Tree thus represents a signal moment in the history of the American poem, the
point when true formal procedure “comes inside.” The poem itself is raucous
& witty, perhaps the high point of the Projectivist tradition, which is so
often accused of being ponderous, as just fun. Kelly of course is moving quite
far from some of his masters – Olson & Blackburn – in utilizing measure
rather than speech as his modeling principle for language, but that is
precisely what he takes from Zukofsky & Duncan. That push-pull aspect of
the Projectivist
tendency, which has never been fully explored critically, is
nowhere more clear than in Kelly, and almost never to greater purpose than in this
poem.
When I would begin Ketjak seven years after the publication
of this book, Axon Dendron Tree was
one of the works that gave my own project its sense of permission &
possibility. Would that every poet had the opportunity to
read Robert Kelly’s long, thin book.
* www.abebooks.com actually lists seven
copies available through used & rare book dealers, ranging in price from
$30 to $275 (for a copy signed to Joel Oppenheimer).
** At 48,
Mac Low had published just four books.