When I was but a pup, still
in high school or just barely out of it, I would frequent the South Campus
environs of the
It would be several years,
literally, before I would muster the courage to introduce myself to that poet –
he seemed so much older, at least 25, & his sense of concentration amid the
chatter, sound of dishes & coffee house music – the Med in those days
favored classical – was truly awesome. It seemed as though he were contained in
a bubble of perfect focus. His name, it turned out, was Kenneth Irby, and he had some
sort of grad student or post-grad job with the University, operating, if I
recall correctly, a mimeograph machine.
It also took me awhile to
understand fully what a wonderful writer Irby was. As was evident even with his
early books from Black Sparrow, Irby was completely persuaded by the poetics of
Projectivism, perhaps because he came to it with the most exquisitely tuned ear
of any poet I have ever encountered. It was as perfect a marriage between a
poet’s gift & his practice as one might imagine.
For all of his obvious &
intense devotion to the process of poetry, Irby never did demonstrate much of
the anxious attention to publication, fame or the “career of the poet” that, in
fact, enables many a lesser writer acquire a far wider reputation. Plus, Irby
was part of a difficult generation, too young to have appeared in the New American Poetry,
too close in age to really separate out fully from those older guys into
something identifiably new & marketable. While some of the poets from that
“tweener” generation did go on to establish
themselves in their own right – Ronald Johnson, Kathleen Fraser, Joanne Kyger,
John Taggart, Clayton Eshleman – many, such as David Schaff,
Seymour Faust, Jonathan Greene, Gail Dusenbury,
Harold Dull or Robert Parker, dropped out of sight entirely while others
transformed their aesthetics in some dramatic fashion, as did Daphne Marlatt & David Bromige. Some, like Irby and George
Stanley, have continued to produce excellent work, but have done so at a
considerable distance from any major scene: Irby has been in
So when I found a poem by
Ken Irby in the new issue of No, adrenalin rushed through my
system. The poem, “[Record]” – the brackets are part of the title – recounts,
as I read it, a dream in which Irby confronts the dead, specifically his mother
& Ed Dorn. While Irby has always liked dreaming as a source for his poetry,
“[Record]” is in some ways an unusual work for him, using a good deal of the
parallel construction one associates more with the Beats:
And
when you die, or when you think you’re dead, or when you dream you’ve died
your feet are turned backwards and your legs and loins
but not your waist
and your arms embrace your head and backwards too and
one of them waves goodbye to the air in the air
and the dancer on your belly whirls and reaches to
regenerate the sun
and rides your body like a boat curved on into the sun
holding all you’ve ever done up like a ticket from amongst
the snakes
and blossoms sway to tickle your navel, the entrance
and the exit, the swivel and the plug, the cast and the release, and the call
That’s just a taste, just
one of the poem’s eight sections, but typing it up here, reading it aloud as I
do, makes me want to holler with excitement. The rhythms capture perfectly an
otherworldly sense of ecstasy, death not as loss but as passage. Whether or not
this should be what eventually greets us – or greets us only in dream – is to a
large degree not relevant, because Irby’s use of rhythm makes it credible, one
hears it in the body as well as in the mind.
* Some of
the terminal hipness of all this drained away when a high school teacher of
mine, Ken Davids, published a novel with Grove Press
about life at the Med, The Softness on
the Other Side of the Hole. Having come full circle, Davids
now writes about coffee.
I, on the other hand, haven’t had a cup in 13 years.