Saturday, September 06, 2003

Blogger has been up & down today, mostly the latter. From Sitemeter, I can tell that it must gone south sometime around 3:00 AM Eastern, and it appears as if it has up sporadically since around 7:00. I finally was able to log at 10:55. But it went down again before I could post. I got back on around 12:20. If you’re reading this, then the problem has been resolved.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

Thoughts while surfing:

 

Jerrold Shiroma’s weblog has declared its affinity for the Philadelphia Eagles. While I half share this bias in the fair-weather way I have about football – I don’t really pay attention until the playoffs – I have this nasty gut feel that tells me that this will be a more difficult year to be a fan of the Iggles, as they are known hereabouts, than it appears on paper.

 

In the meantime, I just want to see if Felipe can take the J’ints past the 6th game of the World Series.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

Patrick Durgin thinks that I used to deploy the term “avant-garde” “along Burger’s lines (Theory of the Avant-Garde)” back in the 1970s. This Burger being Peter, not Mary. But I never liked Burger, Patrick. I did cite him once in my piece on post-modernism in Poetics Journal 7, but only to distinguish his position – which cleaves the “avant-garde” (in his mind dada, surrealism, futurism, etc.) from a more conservative modernism (Pound, Joyce, the cubists) that wanted to recuperate the art object – from that of Clement Greenberg’s, who tended to see such phenomena as continuous. I agree with Greenberg that, say, Pollock needs to be understood as a major thinker, but the positioning of that generation of work – I would include Cage & Olson alongside Pollock, for example, Merce Cunningham in dance – alongside (and, for painting at least, within) the critical confines of an art-critical movement aligned with the New Critics is a far more convoluted & problematic history that I was there trying to untangle.

 

I’ve literally never mentioned Burger elsewhere. I did a search on all my critical writing and, with that exception & references to Mary’s poetry in the blog, every other occurrence to burger alludes to what Helen: Sweetheart of the Internet would call “murdered-cow sandwich.”

 

ш          ш          ш

 

Most irritating habit of 2003: “cute names” for weblogs. In 30 years, these monikers will look like Nehru jackets & puka shell necklaces. I think of them as verbal leisure suits. Like tattoos faded & distended over middle-aged potbellies, they will come to haunt those who chose them. Especially those silly enough to imagine they can ever leave them behind.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

Lethal art?

 

ш          ш          ш

 

The main thing you need to know about the Lyn Hejinian weblog is that it isn’t her. The suspicion here is that it’s Bill Marsh in drag. Or with a sock puppet.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

I love the story of James Meetze’s high school teacher knowing exactly which Allen Ginsberg text to drop on the brutal kitten. But I have to agree with Kasey about which Ginsberg book is the one for the desert island. By the way, Kasey, thanks for including me in that list of Ten Essential 20th-Century Poetics Statements. I am humbled.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

The dark side of blogging.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

Maybe it’s what you deserve when you surf the net one-handed, but Antonio Savoradin confesses that he spewed when he read my reply to John Erhardt.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

The best single-course website I’ve seen of late is Ben Friedlander’s class on “Modern / Postmodern American Poetry: 1940s.” It’s right up there with Al Filreis’ English 88. Ben’s electronic resources page is worth a visit to the site just for itself.

 

I don’t know why, but I always think of English 88 as being the name for a car, something along the lines of a Morris Minor adapted for surfboards. In my mind, Jan & Dean should be singing about English 88. Or maybe Wink Martindale.

 

ш          ш          ш

 

The California recall in Middle English, just because I know you don’t read the humor that appears in what passes for journalism on the right.