In a sense,
it was on
On the one
hand, you would expect the SoQ to be beating the drums, proclaiming this to be
the literary event of the year. & there has been some of that. The subhead
to Peter Davison’s review in The Atlantic
Monthly, a journal founded by James Russell Lowell, reads “The new collection of Robert
Lowell's poems will doubtless stand from now on as The Work.” Similarly, the
subhead to a review A. O. Scott, the New York Times film critic, in Slate,
calls Lowell ”America’s most important career poet.” The Los Angeles Times, which
chose a woman who wrote a book on “living and dying” in the Christian Science
church to review Lowell’s Collected, says that “the magnitude of
Lowell's achievement — an achievement won against horrific odds — can now come fully and magnificently into view.” That at least
deserves some sort of award for overwriting.
At the same
time there has been a lot of ambivalence expressed in the reviews as well, not
so much at the poetry as at the career & faded reputation, suggesting a
deeper (and not overtly expressed) anxiety about what his life & work say
about the SoQ in general. The New York
Times ran a Sunday Magazine piece on “The
Vicissitudes of Literary Reputation,” by Charles McGrath, editor of that
journal’s Book Review. W. H. Pritchard’s review in the Times notes that “
But you
shall. The Collected represents in
many ways one final chance for the