Whenever I
feel too completely dismissive of Robert Lowell, I think of Bob Grenier.
Grenier studied with Lowell at Harvard &, I believe, it was
Lowell who helped Grenier get into the Writers Workshop at Iowa City even as the triumvirate of Creeley,
Zukofsky & Stein were beginning to render Grenier opaque to the Brahmin
crowd back in the Bay State. You can still find vestiges of Lowell’s influence, though, in Grenier’s
first book, Dusk Road Games: Poems
1960-66, published by Pym-Randall Press of Cambridge, Mass.:
On the lawns before the brown
House
on the
hill above the city
the
wheeled sick sit still in the sunshine –
Lowell
turns up again as an influence in the “conservative” portion of Hank Lazer’s
remarkable Doublespace: Poems 1971-1989, his attempt to bridge
the gulf between Le School d’ Quietude & post avant poetics. One of
Marjorie Perloff’s first books was her 1973 The
Poetic Art of Robert Lowell.
But what
always gets in the way of any possible admiration I might have for Lowell is his poetry. When it was first
published in 1946, Lord Weary’s Castle – that title alone tells you everything
about literary allegiances – was read, rightly, as a turn away from any poetics
of direct speech, not only anti-Williams & the polyglot circus of Pound’s Cantos, but even anti-Frost &
anti-Auden. For the New Critics, the conservative agrarian poets who were at
that same moment consolidating their hold on English departments across the United States & beginning to wonder about
their legacy, Lowell was an affirmation of their larger
program. It didn’t hurt that he was a Lowell, either. By the time he was 30, Lowell had already won the Pulitzer Prize and
had a photo spread in Life Magazine.
Yet Lowell,
especially the early Lowell, is seldom a good poet for more
than two or three lines at a time, which invariably are buried in larger
lugubrious monologs that do little more than show a man unable to actually get
to his own writing through his presumptions about “what poetry should be.” It
is precisely that should be, the
sense of obligation to a dead aesthetic inherited from a mostly imaginary
British Literary Heritage, that I take to be behind David Antin’s famous line
“if robert lowell is a poet
i don’t want to be a poet,” a sentiment that was
virtually universal among the poets I knew in the 1960s & ‘70s. Still, in
1964, on a week when Time magazine
could have focused on the aftermath & implications of the first Harlem riots of the decade, it chose
instead to feature Lowell on its cover.