I have
never been what my friends in the gay community might refer to as a size queen.
With regards to poetry, what I mean by that is that the high-end fine press
printing projects that transform ordinary poems into oversize broadsides or
posters sometimes don’t work on me. I like a well-designed broadside as much as
the next poet – one of my all-time favorite projects is one of
Thus Albany has been one of only two
broadsides I’ve had up framed & matted on the walls consistently for the
past fifteen or so years, the other being “An
Alphabet of Subjects (Contents This Notebook),” literally Louis Zukofsky’s
original handwritten plan for Bottom: On
Shakespeare, published in 1979 by his widow Celia. Zukofsky’s notes were
written in a little notebook, 5 by 8 inches, from which this single page
appears to have been saved. Blown up to more than twice its original size – and
the broadside itself has a great deal of white space around it – Zukofsky’s
handwriting is still minute & precise, a testament not just to the
completeness of his vision in first contemplating this project, but his
notorious anal retentiveness as well. But Zukofsky’s original work had been,
after all, just 5 by 8, and there is not textual reason why
In fact, I
can think really of just two projects that absolutely required the large poster
broadside format and could not have been realized without it. One is Robert
Grenier’s Cambridge M’ass,
published by Lyn Hejinian’s Tuumba Press the same year as the Zukofsky
poster. It is, I see from the bio notes – Grenier’s is virtually an
autobiography – in the newest edition of In
the American Tree, 40 by 48 inches, containing 265 poems. It is – or, in my
case, was – a fabulous project. By
putting up all of the poems on one page – text on little white squares of
varying size floating against a black field – Grenier managed to attack the
idea of order at least as deeply as the “Chinese box” publishing of Sentences, with its eminently shufflable
cards.* Some “friend” – if only I could remember who – “borrowed” my copy of Cambridge M’ass in
the relatively early 1980s & never remembered. [If you’re reading this, remember that it’s not too late to return it!]
And by then it was already out of print.
The second
project that absolutely demanded the large post broadside form was Ronald Johnson’s
Blocks to be Arranged in a Pyramid, published
as LVNG Supplemental Series, no. 1,
in an edition of 366 in 1996. This broadside is wider than it is high, 19
inches by 25.The poem itself consists of 66 quatrains, printed in what appears
to me to be 11-point Times Roman on a 13-point line. The first stanza is
centered at the top of the page, the next two stanzas appear in the “line”
beneath the first, one slightly to the left, the other slightly to the right.
The third such line has three stanzas, the fourth four and so forth – there are
eleven of these “lines” of stanzas altogether. The first three stanzas might
give a hint of what this is like:
Then with a sweep
blindly eradicate
perception itself
afire with egress
step in a blink rolled door aside
blank as paper And stood beside space
few fields beyond place of sepulcher
pure fallen Snow in splice of time
It’s
interesting that, unlike works with parallel columns, the visual set up of this
piece never leaves on (or never leaves me
at least) wondering whether I should read down or across – these are very
evidently, even confidently stanzas, intended to be heard whole, each by each,
even if we proceed between them left to right. It’s also interesting to see a
line – it is very much that – that proceeds stanza by stanza, even if as here
the effect is primarily graphic. Just to imagine how that curious invisible
thing we call “the line” can be in any way different without simply going
scattershot across the page a la Olson is a tremendous feat.
Unlike most
political art – this is very much an AIDS poem, unapologetically so – Blocks to be Arranged in a Pyramid is
some of – may even be – Ronald Johnson’s strongest poetry. One of course hears
all the echoes of Zukofsky, as one does even in Johnson’s Milton in Radi Os, but the influence is so utterly put
to new purposes that it’s transformed & the sense of Johnson as a
derivative poet here is no different, really, than one gets in the work of
Robert Duncan, who argued, at times convincingly, that all poetry needs to be
understood as derivative. It’s a wonderful work &, when I get some extra
cash, this is very apt to be the third broadside framed & up on the wall.
What evoked
all this was that I’ve been getting Big Mail lately. Not just the Johnson,
which Devon Johnston so kindly sent awhile back, but also Derek Beaulieu’s
wonderful With Wax from Buffalo’s
Cuneiform Press. This isn’t a broadside, but a book, a BIG BOOK, whose text is printed literally on a
single sheet of paper that folds out the way car ads do from Sports Illustrated to reveal four
exquisite little prose poems, set in 18-point type on
24-point lines. Like Albany, With Wax didn’t
have to be so lovely, it just is. In fact, my copy arrived with the most
beautifully printed press release – because of the dark blue handmade paper – I
have ever seen. Not readable, mind you, but fabulous nonetheless.
But With Wax’s 12.25 by 9.75 inch format –
the website calls it 34.5 by 24 cm, folding out to a 34.5 by 96 cm page – is
just a pocketbook in comparison with Accurate
Key 1.5, a supplement to Accurate
Key, a Milwaukee-based journal that appears to publish all
of its works in broadside format. Its inaugural issue came in a box
(with a John Wieners poem printed into its inner “back” cover), even if the
individual pages were ordinary enough 7.5 by 10 inch sheets. But 1.5 is 17
inches high by 8.5 wide – fit that into
your bookcase! The works in both issues are quite wonderful – there is a
Creeley in the inaugural issue & Alice Notely appears in both, plus some of
the same
1.5 in
particular reminds me of a time, many moons ago, when
There were
only 275 copies of the box and I can’t find any details concerning 1.5, but an
email to singlepress@yahoo.com might
at least tell you if any of these are still available.
* Michael
Davidson used to tell a story of assigning Sentences
to his students who would have to troop to UCSD’s
special collections office in the library to inspect it, the undergraduates
being ever so responsible and taking great care to not get the cards “out of
order” only to get hysterical if & when Davidson himself happened by, came
up to the deck and literally shuffled it in front of them.
** To this
day, Colin has a Hatch poster of a “circus alphabet” framed on the wall of his
room.